Відео

i took almost 5 minutes to find the start of the video, survived a minute of the rambling lack of respect you have for the general public, then took about 3 minutes to let you know that until this moment i was a subscriber. you obviously think higher of yourself than the rest of the world does. have a nice concurred life, doofus.

Video starts at 10:40

You are such a good coach. But because you are not using catchy thumbnail and modern interface,you aren't getting your deserved views

Great stream, even though i watched it as a video, really informative

i'm glad you stream on youtube now too, as someone who lives in Europe it means I can actually catch up with you later. thanks again coach

Obviously, he believed he could crush his opponent, so he allowed himself to play less accurately. This type of chess players are the easiest to defeat, among those who are stronger than me, they are dragged down by their bullet game. My first choice is “e5”， because I don't want to lose the Bishop or the Knight. Bad bishop? It's better than nothing, after the Rook move out, the bad bishop will be thrown into the battlefield. And almost all of my flexible tactics rely on knights. “Nd4”，because it's not my idea,I doubted it. But after accepting your point of view, I realized that it indeed better, and I am willing to change my mind.Thank you~

this might be best video so far

Great stuff Andras!

I don't think Be3 is a real mistake, even Stockish 16 evaluates both Be3 and Nc3 the same (+1.1). After h6 was played, g5 is not a square for bishop anymore, e3 looks like the best spot. Nd2 and especially Bxd5 are screaming mistakes which student needs to understand of course.

I’ve premoved this before in bullet. Can I have a GM title?

Hello to the chicos and the chicas

Might be the first Andras video I haven’t given a thumbs up, but then here we go writing comments and boosting the algorithm! All the best coach.

Sorry Coach, definitely not your best video! 🤣

The powers-that-be are trying to silence the best chess teacher on You Tube. We will not stand for this!

The shortest miniatures ever!

So what do I do when I’ve identified 3 good things and 3 bad things about a move and all of them seem to be equally valuable? This is where the single reason mindset develops cause you just don’t know what is relevant and what isn’t

This. This is good advice. I found the knight move but yes that pawn move does make a lot of sense and i wouldn't have thought to play it

No prob coach ... as we can see even draw could be great games.

Thanks!

Andras Toth is a very good chess teacher. He will get technical issues worked out.

First step to to failure is trying.

so helpful as always! Thanks, coach!

Really good advice

This is such great content.

Very well done video. Thanks

Thx. Guilty as charched.

5:35. I'm concerned that you might have overlooked that the knight is attacking the bishop if you allow white to take the c5 pawn. White's queen protects f3.

Great stuff

Is it just me who finds that the positions Andras says are obviously good for black (or white) are not at all obvious? I don’t play that regularly but I’m not exactly low rated compared to most players.

Love your videos

Amazing concepts, thank you for yout videos, I´ve learn about calculation here with you. <3 Cheers from Mexico!

The Doctor is in the house!

When next are you going to stream on UA-cam? Also, can you make a video about how to take advantage of colour complexes? For example when an opponent pushes all their pawns into that hedgehog like format, I feel like it's bad and I should be "taking advantage of the light/dark squares" but I'm not really sure what that means....specifically with the knight. This comment wa going to be longer but as I tried to explain more I think I answered my own question so maybe I really just need to start playing longer games and thinking more...but why do that when I can just ask the best chess coach on UA-cam 😅

Superbe lesson. It's so easy to see ghost.

Hi coach. Thank you for taking the time to make these videos for us. You're an excellent teacher imo.

Very instructive video, thank you for that. I make some of those mistakes too, without even noticing

Nice video :) I'm about the same rating as the student in the first example, but my assessment was very different; I'm glad to see how closely my thought-process aligned with yours in the video. At a glance, my first candidate move was ...e5, but my purpose was different. The g7 bishop is a crucial defender of my dark-squares around the king, so I first looked at interference moves to preserve my bishop. I liked the look of the pawn on e5 because of the space advantage, but then I decided to look at other candidate moves because I'd prefer to keep the e-pawn on e7; advancing it to e6 or e5 would make the f6 dark-square even weaker. The next candidate move I had was ...Nd4 and I quite liked this move a lot. I was more like "yeah, that's the move to play here." I admit that ...Bb7 wasn't even on my radar; it wasn't even a candidate move. I liked ...Nd4 for the same reasons this video shared, but I will also comment that despite me playing ...Nd4 if this was a position of mine, I did like the pawn on e5 slightly more than first thought because once you pointed out the presence of the bishop pair in the video, then my mind instantly went to highlighting their weakness. We both have a DSB, but that means I typically want to accentuate the LSB and place my central pawns on dark-squares. We have a pawn on c5 and another on e5 looks good from this perspective.

Ya I know im bad at chess. LOL

GG ❤ Book review Rock solid chess vol 2 part 2 soon ? 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Great video as usual! My take away is to avoid misevaluating static considerations that don’t apply because the position is dynamic in nature (ie the pawns are fluid). That being said the whole g7 bishop is bad but now the b7 bishop is super strong is very unobvious at my amateur 1600 level

Thanks for the great update on this complex lesson.

Good video!

'the bishop on bad is g7' ist already a timeless Classic 😜😜

This video is one week too late coach, I lost a crucial game in a tournament last Thursday because I made this exact mistake twice! I rejected one line because 'a pawn was hanging' and stopped looking there (missing my counter-attack). Another line of my opponent I dismissed because it required him to give up a strong bishop for my knight. I was shocked he played this anyway; since he gained 2 tempi in the proces.

Just seen the video, AMAZING and very funny to calculare before you announce lines….BUT…. My question is: given: * the startint position * my almost 1800 rating otb * my immediately gut feeling that Qh6 somehow works and white is winning * some optimism for white that should play for attack and not for defense ….. which lines should I calculate in around 10 minutes to make a move and when should I stop the calculations ?

Great lesson, thanks!

Thanks!

Thanks!

The first game is exactly what happened in the last game i played as black

Seriously underated coach...keep up the good work 🔥💯